Cardiac time intervals and myocardial performance index for prediction of twin–twin transfusion syndrome (2024)

  • Journal List
  • Wiley Open Access Collection
  • PMC9292435

As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsem*nt of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice

Cardiac time intervals and myocardial performance index for prediction of twin–twin transfusion syndrome (1)

Prenat Diagn. 2021 Nov; 41(12): 1498–1503.

Published online 2021 Jun 17. doi:10.1002/pd.5981

PMCID: PMC9292435

PMID: 34107089

Manon Gijtenbeek,Cardiac time intervals and myocardial performance index for prediction of twin–twin transfusion syndrome (2)1 Sanne J. Eschbach,1 Johanna M. Middeldorp,1 Frans J. C. M. Klumper,1 Femke Slaghekke,1 Dick Oepkes,1 and Monique C. Haak1

Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer

Associated Data

Data Availability Statement

Abstract

Objectives

To explore whether intertwin discordance in myocardial performance index (MPI) or cardiac time intervals enables the prediction of twin–twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) in monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) pregnancies with amniotic fluid discordance.

Methods

Prospective cohort study of MCDA pregnancies with amniotic fluid discordance ≥4cm. Serial ultrasound examinations consisted of evaluation of amniotic fluid, fetal Dopplers and fetal cardiac function.

Results

We included 21 “future‐TTTS” (group I), 18 selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR; group II) and 20 uncomplicated MCDA twin pairs (group III). Group I had a higher intertwin difference in left ventricle (LV) MPI and right ventricle (RV) MPI compared to group II and III. The intertwin difference in global heart relaxation time was significantly higher in group I compared to group III. Future recipient twins had significantly higher contraction times of the global heart and RV and lower relaxation times of the global heart and RV compared to the “expected recipients” in group II and III.

Conclusion

Intertwin discordance in LV‐MPI and RV‐MPI differentiate between TTTS and MCDA pregnancies with transient discordant amniotic fluid volume. Cardiac time intervals identify future recipient twins. The clinical utility of cardiac time intervals and MPI should be investigated in large prospective studies.

Key Points

What’s already known about this topic?

  • Previous attempts to find improved methods to stratify the risk for twin–twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) include different measures of fetal cardiac dysfunction, but results have been disappointing so far.

What does this study add?

  • Intertwin discordance in myocardial performance index differentiates between future TTTS and monochorionic diamniotic pregnancies with discordant amniotic fluid volume without TTTS.

  • Cardiac time intervals can help to identify future recipient twins.

1. INTRODUCTION

Improved prediction of twin–twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) is needed to identify pregnancies that will benefit most from expert follow‐up.1 Early detection of TTTS allows for referral of patients to a fetal therapy center where laser surgery can be performed. Complications may be prevented with early detection and appropriate treatment. The preceding events of TTTS are however underexplored and the pathophysiological triggers involved in the transition from balanced to unbalanced intertwin transfusion resulting in TTTS, remain largely unknown.2, 3

Previous attempts to find improved methods to stratify the risk for TTTS include different measures of fetal cardiac dysfunction. In a study by Zanardini etal.4 in 100 uncomplicated monochorionic twin pregnancies at 18 weeks’ gestation the myocardial performance index (MPI) assessed by tissue Doppler imaging in the left ventricle (LV) of the future recipient showed a cut‐off more than 0.52 to detect more than 90% of subsequent TTTS cases, for a false‐positive rate of 10%.4 In this study however, the analysis was done based on the MPI of the future recipient twin, whereas, at baseline, both twins are supposed to have still normal amniotic fluid levels and it would therefore be impossible to foretell which of the twins will become the recipient. It would be more useful to predict which pregnancy will develop TTTS, from a cohort of pregnancies with some amniotic fluid difference (“pre‐TTTS”). Wohlmuth etal.5 attempted to discriminate between “pre‐TTTS” and monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) controls using ventricular strain. No differences in right ventricular (RV) or LV strain discordance between “pre‐TTTS” and MCDA controls were found.5 As we believe that cardiac function is already compromised in “pre‐TTTS,” modalities with better test characteristics than ventricular strain, such as the MPI and measurement of cardiac time intervals6 by color tissue Doppler imaging (cTDI), may be able to discriminate between normal and abnormal cardiac function.4, 7, 8

The aim of this prospective study was therefore to explore whether intertwin discordance in MPI or cardiac time intervals by cTDI in MCDA pregnancies with amniotic fluid difference not yet fulfilling TTTS criteria could distinguish future TTTS pregnancies from those only affected by discordant growth or discordant amniotic fluid volume without TTTS.

2. METHODS

This study was a single center prospective cohort study performed at the Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC) between January 2015 and March 2017. The LUMC is the national referral center for fetal therapy. In this study, all consecutive patients attending our monochorionic twin pregnancy clinic and patients that were referred to our center for the suspicion of TTTS were included. In case of amniotic fluid discrepancy, the frequency of ultrasound examination was at least twice per week. We excluded monoamniotic pregnancies, triplets and cases with congenital anomalies (including acquired right ventricular outflow tract obstruction) or twin anemia‐polycythemia sequence (TAPS).9 The study was approved by the medical ethical committee of the Leiden University Medical Center (NL 45251.058.13).

Each ultrasound examination consisted of amniotic fluid evaluation (deepest vertical pocket), fetal Dopplers and evaluation of fetal cardiac function. Fetal biometry was measured every two weeks.

Selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) was defined as: estimated fetal weight (EFW) of one twin less than third percentile or at least two of four contributory parameters (EFW of one twin <10th percentile, abdominal circumference of one twin <10th centile, EFW discordance ≥25%, and UA‐PI of the smaller twin >95th percentile).10 TTTS was diagnosed using standard European diagnostic ultrasound criteria11 and pregnancies were staged prospectively according to the Quintero staging system.12 If TTTS criteria were not (yet) fulfilled, “pre‐TTTS” was defined as an intertwin amniotic fluid discordance ≥4cm. “Future TTTS” pregnancies were those which progressed to TTTS stage 1 or more. “sFGR” pregnancies were those diagnosed with sFGR and who never progressed to TTTS. “Uncomplicated” MCDA pregnancies never fulfilled the criteria of the beforementioned groups. In this group the amniotic fluid discordance remained stable or decreased. The “expected recipient” was the fetus with the largest deepest vertical pocket, the “expected donor” was the fetus with the smallest deepest vertical pocket (in sFGR also the smallest fetus).

Fetal echocardiography was performed by two experienced sonographers (M. G. and S. E.) using a Canon Aplio 500 (Canon Medical Systems Corporation) with a PVT‐674BT 6MHz transducer in early second trimester and a PVT‐375BT 3.5MHz transducer in late second trimester. The LV‐MPI and RV‐MPI were obtained with pulsed‐wave Doppler, in the absence of fetal movements. LV‐MPI was measured according to the Mod‐MPI technique of Hernandez‐Andrade etal.13 Briefly, the isovolumetric contraction (ICT) and isovolumetric relaxation (IRT) times were obtained by measuring the time interval between the closure of the atrioventricular valve and its subsequent opening in the next cardiac cycle (atrioventricular valve time). In the LV, the ejection time (ET) was measured from the opening to the closure of the mitral valve. Mod‐MPI was calculated as (ICT+IRT)/ET. In the RV measurements were obtained separately for the tricuspid and pulmonary valves due to the right‐sided valves’ anatomical configuration. RV‐MPI was calculated as (isovolumetric time−ejection time)/ejection time. Discrepant fetal heart rate was not an exclusion criterion, since large fluctuations in fetal heart rate could potentially be part of underlying pathological processes.14, 15 In addition, color‐coded tissue Doppler clips containing five or more cardiac cycles in the absence of fetal movements, were stored in an apical or basal four‐chamber view. Three regions of interest (ROIs) were examined in each clip, according to our previously described technique.6 A large ROI was used covering the whole heart to evaluate global heart function. Two small ROI’s were used to evaluate the RV wall and the LV wall just above the atrioventricular valves. In images derived from cTDI, the change in direction of myocardial movement results in nadirs in the curve (Figure ​(Figure1).1). Shortening time (St) was defined as the duration of myocardial motion during ventricular contraction. Lengthening time (Lt) was defined as the duration of myocardial motion during ventricular relaxation or expansion. Both St and Lt were expressed as a percentage of the total duration of one cardiac cycle. Measurements were performed without blinding to twin pairing or pregnancy outcome.

Open in a separate window

FIGURE 1

Schematic illustration of the cardiac cycle using color tissue Doppler imaging (cTDI), placement of regions of interest (ROI) and demarcations of lengthening time (Lt) and shortening time (St) in the derived image. Adapted from Eschbach etal.6

2.1. Statistical analysis

Intertwin discordances of MPI measurements and cardiac time intervals were calculated as “expected recipient”−“expected donor”. Individual measurements and intertwin discordances were compared between “future TTTS” and “sFGR” and between “future TTTS” and “uncomplicated” twins using the one‐way analysis of variance. Consecutive ultrasound examinations of one twin‐pair were included in the analysis, if available. Best cut‐off points were identified by analysis of the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. To maximize both sensitivity and specificity, the Youden’s J‐statistic was applied (sensitivity+specificity−1).16 Data were analyzed using SPSS v23 (IBM) and the level of significance was set at p<0.05.

3. RESULTS

A total of 59 MCDA pregnancies with “pre‐TTTS” were included. Twenty‐one pregnancies were allocated to group I: pre‐TTTS that evolved to TTTS, all treated by laser. Growth discordance prelaser was present in 14 of 21 twin pairs. The disease severity according to Quintero stages was distributed as follows: Stage I, n=5; Stage II, n=9; Stage III, n=7. The median gestational age at laser was 17+6 weeks (interquartile range, 15+4–20+1). Eighteen pregnancies were allocated to group II: pregnancies only complicated by sFGR, of which nine were Gratacos stage I, three were Gratacos stage II, and six were Gratacos stage III. The remaining 20 pregnancies were allocated to group III: no sFGR, no TTTS, no TAPS, amniotic fluid discordance remained stable or decreased. A total of 111 ultrasound scans were available. The median gestational age at first ultrasound was 30±4 years in group I, 30±5 years in group II, and 31±5 years in group III. The mean body mass index of mothers was 25 (21–28) kg/m2 in group I, 25 (22–28) kg/m2 in group II, and 26 (23–28) kg/m2 in group III. Sixty‐seven percent of patients in group I was nulliparous, compared to 59% in group II and 74% in group III.

3.1. MPI by pulsed wave Doppler

Group I (future‐TTTS) had a higher intertwin difference in LV‐MPI and RV‐MPI compared to group II (sFGR) and group III (uncomplicated), but a statistically difference was only found between group I and III. Compared to group III, the intertwin discordance in LV‐MPI and RV‐MPI in group I was twice as large (0.15 vs. 0.08, p=0.03 and 0.25 vs. 0.12, p=0.02). Comparing group I with both group II+III showed similar results (Table ​(Table1).1). Individual MPI measurements were not statistically significant different across future TTTS stages in group I (data not shown). Pregnancies that evolved into a higher TTTS stage showed a larger intertwin difference in RV‐MPI (Stage 1: 0.06, Stage 2: 0.26, and Stage 3: 0.36; p=0.001).

TABLE 1

Myocardial performance index

ParameterFuture‐TTTSsFGRUncomplicatedNo‐TTTS (sFGR+uncomplicated)
LV‐MPI donor0.500.510.57*0.53
LV‐MPI recipient0.580.580.610.60
dLV‐MPI0.150.100.08*0.09*
RV‐MPI donor0.530.510.550.53
RV‐MPI recipient0.640.640.620.63
dRV‐MPI0.250.180.12*0.15*

Open in a separate window

Abbreviations: d, delta; LV, left ventricle; MPI, myocardial performance index; RV, right ventricle; sFGR, selective fetal growth restriction; TTTS, twin–twin transfusion syndrome.

*p<0.05, Compared to group I.

3.2. Cardiac time intervals by cTDI

Overall contraction times were higher and relaxation times were lower in future recipients (group I), compared to the “expected recipient” in group II or III. The intertwin difference in global heart relaxation time (dGlobal RT) was significantly higher in group I compared to group III. Future recipient twins had significantly higher contraction times of the global heart, right ventricle and left ventricle compared to the ‘expected recipients’ in group II+III. Future recipient twins had significantly lower relaxation times of the global heart and right ventricle compared to the ‘expected recipients’ in group II+III (Table ​(Table22).

TABLE 2

Cardiac time intervals

ParameterFuture‐TTTSsFGRUncomplicatedNo‐TTTS (sFGR+uncomplicated)
Global Ct donor44%44%45%44%
Global Ct recipient49%46%*45%*45%*
dGlobal Ct7.1%4.4%6.8%5.5%
Global Rt donor46%44%44%44%
Global Rt recipient37%41%*43%*42%*
dGlobal Rt11.6%6.3%*7.7%6.9%*
RV Ct recipient51%45%*45%*45%*
RV Rt recipient37%45%*44%*45%*

Open in a separate window

Abbreviations: Ct, contraction time; d, delta; LV, left ventricle; Rt, relaxation time, RV, right ventricle; sFGR, selective fetal growth restriction; TTTS, twin–twin transfusion syndrome.

*p<0.05, Compared to group I.

3.3. Cut‐off values

The best cut‐off point for each parameter was identified from its ROC curve to assess its predictive value in MCDA pregnancies an amniotic fluid difference ≥4cm. Tables ​Tables3,3, ​,4,4, ​,55 gives the predictive performance of cardiac parameters, for the subsequent development of TTTS. The chance of TTTS was higher in case of lower values of relaxation times (Rt).

TABLE 3

Analysis of cut‐off points, sensitivity and specificity

ParameterCut‐offSensitivitySpecificity
dLV‐MPI0.1363.4%76.9%
dRV‐MPI0.2166.7%78.6%
Global Ct recipient48.2%70.8%72.3%
Global Rt recipient40.0%58.2%75.0%
dGlobal Rt9.9%64.3%79.4%
RV Ct recipient49.9%65.2%81.5%
RV Rt recipient38.7%87.0%73.9%

Open in a separate window

Note: Group I (future‐TTTS) versus group II+III (no‐TTTS).

Abbreviations: Ct, contraction time; d, delta; LV, left ventricle; MPI, myocardial performance index; RV, right ventricle; Rt, relaxation time; TTTS, twin–twin transfusion syndrome.

TABLE 4

Analysis of cut‐off points, sensitivity, and specificity

ParameterCut‐offSensitivitySpecificity
Global Ct recipient48.2%71.8%73.1%
Global Rt recipient35.2%92.3%50.0%
dGlobal Rt9.9%64.3%88.9%
RV Ct recipient49.9%65.2%88.0%
RV Rt recipient38.7%96.0%73.9%

Open in a separate window

Note: Group I (future‐TTTS) versus group II (sFGR).

Abbreviations: Ct, contraction time; d, delta; Rt, relaxation time; RV, right ventricle; sFGR, selective fetal growth restriction; TTTS, twin–twin transfusion syndrome.

TABLE 5

Analysis of cut‐off points, sensitivity and specificity

ParameterCut‐offSensitivitySpecificity
dLV‐MPI0.0972.7%73.3%
dRV‐MPI0.2166.7%83.3%
Global Ct recipient47.8%70.8%72.4%
Global Rt recipient40.0%65.5%75.0%
RV Ct recipient49.8%65.2%75.9%
RV Rt recipient40.8%76.9%82.6%

Open in a separate window

Note: Group I (future‐TTTS) versus group III (uncomplicated).

Abbreviations: Ct, contraction time; d, delta; LV, left ventricle; Rt, relaxation time; RV, right ventricle; TTTS, twin–twin transfusion syndrome.

4. DISCUSSION

We assessed the MPI and cardiac time intervals in MCDA twins with discordant amniotic fluid. In this exploratory analysis we have found that intertwin discordance in LV‐MPI and RV‐MPI may help to differentiate between future TTTS and MCDA pregnancies with discordant amniotic fluid volume without TTTS. Using cardiac time intervals measured by cTDI clinicians at tertiary care centers can furthermore identify future recipient twins and differentiate between future TTTS and sFGR and uncomplicated MCDA pregnancies. Identifying recipient twins may especially help in cases where the cardiac function of the “stuck” donor or extremely small fetus cannot be assessed, and intertwin discordance cannot be estimated.

The increased intertwin discordance in cardiac parameters in future TTTS twins found in this study is in line with a previous study where impaired ventricular strain was found in pre‐recipient twins.5 The development of unbalanced intertwin transfusion seems to be associated with early signs of cardiac function changes.

Worldwide, the MPI technique is gaining popularity and the number of articles on cardiac function as measured by MPI is increasing, but even study groups that have invested extensive research efforts into MPI acknowledge the limitations in reproducibility.7, 17 Furthermore, most studies in the literature are focused mainly on fetal cardiac function in monochorionic pregnancies already complicated by TTTS. Due to the limited number of articles investigating “pre‐TTTS” results regarding the utility of the MPI and other cardiac parameters to predict TTTS, cardiac parameters are currently not used in the risk stratification of TTTS. In this study, the intertwin difference in LV‐MPI and RV‐MPI were found to be predictors for TTTS, with a specificity of approximately 80%. Higher MPI values found in the larger twin in sFGR may be explained by an increase in cardiac output and potentially a hyperdynamic circulation, as a result of perfusion of the placenta of the smaller one via arterioarterial anastomoses. This resembles a milder form of the situation observed in monochorionic twins with an acardiac fetus.18

The results of our study show that tissue Doppler seems to be even more sensitive to detect subtle cardiac dysfunction compared to conventional Doppler. In line with findings of our previous study where recipient twins could be discriminated from uncomplicated monochorionic twins,6 we have found decreased contraction times and increased relaxation times in the future recipient twins. The RV relaxation time in the “expected recipient” showed a high sensitivity (87%) to detect the future TTTS recipient. RV contraction time in the “expected recipient” shows a good specificity of 82%. The clinical problem of dealing with a large fluid discrepancy in a selective growth‐restricted twin pair may furthermore be overcome using cardiac time intervals, since the future TTTS can be differentiated from sFGR by identification of the future recipient twin as shown by data in Tables ​Tables22 and ​and44.

Using both indices (MPI and cardiac time intervals using cTDI), follow‐up could be planned with a larger interval. This could allow a significant reduction in the number of ultrasounds and prevent unnecessary travels to a fetal therapy center far from home. However, the safety of this approach needs to be validated in larger prospective studies.

There are limitations to this study. Our study cohort consists partly of monochorionic twins referred to our center for the suspicion of TTTS, which could have introduced a selection bias. We have used the modified MPI technique to improve reproducibility, however, reproducibility of (manual) measurement of MPI is known to be still limited. This study includes a limited number of patients. The clinical applicability of our measurements therefore have be confirmed by large prospective (multicenter) studies. Multiple comparisons performed in this study may have increased the likelihood of statistically significant differences resulting from random rather than systematic variation. Correction for multiple testing is however a subject of debate, and is not always advised if study aims have an exploratory nature.19, 20

5. CONCLUSIONS

Fetal cardiac function evaluation improves early detection of TTTS. If referring hospitals are able to stratify between future TTTS and MCDA pregnancies with transient amniotic fluid differences, unnecessary hospital visits or referrals (important in countries with large traveling distances) may be avoided, and pregnant women who are likely to develop TTTS will benefit from timely expert follow‐up. The potential utility of cardiac time intervals and MPI in the triage of amniotic fluid discordance should be confirmed in large prospective (multicenter) studies, validating our estimated cut‐off points. Furthermore, automatized measurements are needed since measurements of MPI or cardiac time intervals require expert hands and are time consuming.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank the parents of all twins who participated in this study. Manon Gijtenbeek is supported by a research fund of Canon Medical System Corporation Otawara‐Shi, Tochigi, Japan.

Notes

Gijtenbeek M, Eschbach SJ, Middeldorp JM, et al. Cardiac time intervals and myocardial performance index for prediction of twin–twin transfusion syndrome. Prenat Diagn. 2021;41(12):1498‐1503. 10.1002/pd.5981 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data available on request from the authors.

REFERENCES

1. Lewi L, Lewi P, Diemert A, etal. The role of ultrasound examination in the first trimester and at 16 weeks' gestation to predict fetal complications in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:493.e1‐493.e7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

2. Wohlmuth C, Gardiner HM, Diehl W, Hecher K. Fetal cardiovascular hemodynamics in twin‐twin transfusion syndrome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016;95:664‐671. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

3. Wohlmuth C, Boudreaux D, MoiseKJ, Jr, etal. Cardiac pathophysiology in twin‐twin transfusion syndrome: new insights into its evolution. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51:341‐348. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. Zanardini C, Prefumo F, Fichera A, Botteri E, Frusca T. Fetal cardiac parameters for prediction of twin‐to‐twin transfusion syndrome. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44:434‐440. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Wohlmuth C, Agarwal A, Stevens B, etal. Fetal ventricular strain in uncomplicated and selective growth restricted monochorionic diamniotic pregnancies, with cardiovascular responses in pre‐TTTS. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;56:694‐704. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

6. Eschbach SJ, Gijtenbeek M, van Geloven N, Oepkes D, Haak MC. Measurement of cardiac function by cardiac time intervals, applicability in normal pregnancy and twin‐to‐twin transfusion syndrome. J Echocardiogr. 2019;17:129‐137. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

7. Henry A, Gopikrishna S, Mahajan A, Alphonse J, Meriki N, Welsh AW. Use of the Foetal Myocardial Performance Index in monochorionic, diamniotic twin pregnancy: a prospective cohort and nested case‐control study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32:2017‐2029. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Raboisson MJ, Fouron JC, Lamoureux J, etal. Early intertwin differences in myocardial performance during the twin‐to‐twin transfusion syndrome. Circulation. 2004;110:3043‐3048. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

9. Slaghekke F, Kist WJ, Oepkes D, etal. Twin anemia‐polycythemia sequence: diagnostic criteria, classification, perinatal management and outcome. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2010;27:181‐190. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10. Khalil A, Beune I, Hecher K, etal. Consensus definition and essential reporting parameters of selective fetal growth restriction in twin pregnancy: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53:47‐54. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

11. Johnson A. Diagnosis and management of twin‐twin transfusion syndrome. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2015;58:611‐631. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Quintero RA, Morales WJ, Allen MH, Bornick PW, Johnson PK, Kruger M. Staging of twin‐twin transfusion syndrome. J Perinatol. 1999;19:550‐555. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

13. Hernandez‐Andrade E, Lopez‐Tenorio J, Figueroa‐Diesel H, etal. A modified myocardial performance (Tei) index based on the use of valve clicks improves reproducibility of fetal left cardiac function assessment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26:227‐232. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

14. Visser GH, Redman CW, Huisjes HJ, Turnbull AC. Nonstressed antepartum heart rate monitoring: implications of decelerations after spontaneous contractions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;138:429‐435. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

15. Weiner Z, Farmakides G, Schulman H, Penny B. Central and peripheral hemodynamic changes in fetuses with absent end‐diastolic velocity in umbilical artery: correlation with computerized fetal heart rate pattern. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170:509‐515. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Youden WJ. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer. 1950;3:32‐35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

17. Henry A, Alphonse J, Tynan D, Welsh AW. Fetal myocardial performance index in assessment and management of small‐for‐gestational‐age fetus: a cohort and nested case‐control study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51:225‐235. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

18. Umur A, van Gemert MJ, van den Wijngaard JP, Ross MG, Nikkels PGJ. Haemodynamic resistance model of monochorionic twin pregnancies complicated by acardiac twinning. Phys Med Biol. 2004;49:N205‐N213. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

19. Feise RJ. Do multiple outcome measures require p‐value adjustment?BMC Med Res Methodol. 2002;2:8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. Rothman KJ. No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology. 1990;1:43‐46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Prenatal Diagnosis are provided here courtesy of Wiley

Cardiac time intervals and myocardial performance index for prediction of twin–twin transfusion syndrome (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Ouida Strosin DO

Last Updated:

Views: 5788

Rating: 4.6 / 5 (56 voted)

Reviews: 95% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Ouida Strosin DO

Birthday: 1995-04-27

Address: Suite 927 930 Kilback Radial, Candidaville, TN 87795

Phone: +8561498978366

Job: Legacy Manufacturing Specialist

Hobby: Singing, Mountain biking, Water sports, Water sports, Taxidermy, Polo, Pet

Introduction: My name is Ouida Strosin DO, I am a precious, combative, spotless, modern, spotless, beautiful, precious person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.